ELIZABETH, N.J. — Tens of thousands of dockworkers went on strike from Texas to Maine on Tuesday to demand higher wages and a ban on all automation at ports in a move that could snarl supply chains only a month ahead of the presidential election.
The International Longshoremen’s Association union and the United States Maritime Alliance, which represents employers in the longshore industry, were unable to reach a new contract agreement. This is the union’s first strike since 1977, when dockworkers stopped work for several weeks.
More than 500 union members gathered at the gates of Maher Terminals in Elizabeth, New Jersey early Tuesday for the start of the strike. Harold Daggett, International President of the ILA, rallied the crowd as he spoke at one of the main container terminal operators at Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal, an important facility for goods entering the New York Metropolitan area.
“These greedy corporations, everything they got, they got from us. We’re the ones who worked through the pandemic to make them the money they got,” Daggett said in an interview.
When asked how long the strike would last, Daggett said that union members will stay on strike “until the end.”
On Monday, the ILA said employers were price-gouging customers by charging much more for containers, which would lead to higher prices for consumers. It stated that the wages offered by USMX were still too low to accept.
“The Ocean Carriers represented by USMX want to enjoy rich billion-dollar profits that they are making in 2024, while they offer ILA Longshore Workers an unacceptable wage package that we reject,” the union said in a statement. “ILA longshore workers deserve to be compensated for the important work they do keeping American commerce moving and growing.”
Scott Weiss, a member of ILA Local 1804-1, inspects containers that come off of ships entering at Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal, as well the chassis of the trucks that then carry the containers filled with goods away to destinations all along the East Coast.
Weiss said that the union is asking for wage increases that can cover the cost of inflation, and that a human eye is still needed to do his job right, even in the face of increasing automation.
“Employers push automation under the guise of safety, but it’s really about cutting labor costs to increase their already exceptionally high profits. Automation of our nation’s ports should be a concern for everyone,” he said. “The truth is robots do not pay taxes, and they do not spend money in their communities.”
The union said it will continue to handle military cargo and work passenger cruise ships.
Before the strike began, USMX said it offered a wage increase of nearly 50% and increasing employer contributions to employee retirement plans. USMX said their offer would still retain the same language on automation. The employers filed an unfair labor practice complaint on Wednesday with the National Labor Relations Board in which they accused the union of refusing to come to the bargaining table.
“In the last 24 hours, the USMX and ILA have traded counter offers related to wages. The USMX increased our offer and has also requested an extension of the current Master Contract, now that both sides have moved off their previous positions. We are hopeful that this could allow us to fully resume collective bargaining around the other outstanding issues – in an effort to reach an agreement,” USMX said in a statement Monday.
Voters remain laser-focused on the economy heading into the Nov. 5 election. Eighty-one percent of registered voters say the economy is very important to their vote for president this November, according to a poll published last month from the nonpartisan Pew Research Center.
Lauren Saidel-Baker, a speaker and economist at ITR Economics, a nonpartisan economic research and consulting firm based in New Hampshire, said that the longer the strike goes on, the greater the impact will be on inflation. Inflation cooled significantly enough for the Federal Reserve to cut the federal funds rate by half a percentage point last month.
“If this is just a week, again, there will be short-term disruptions and maybe things take a little bit longer to get where they’re going. That could be a risk for perishable items,” she said.
The supply chain issues that affected retail prices at the beginning of the pandemic may have prepared businesses for some disruption, she said, and this could mitigate some of the effects for consumers in the short term.
“We’re in a very unique situation where we just had this major, major supply chain disruption that caused a lot of American businesses to make contingency plans in a way that they just haven’t in the past. We have creativity and increased flexibility that will help us if this is just a brief disruption,” she said. “We still have elevated inventories in some sectors, so there might be a little bit more buffer in certain goods getting where they’re going.”
Aside from the economic effects on consumers, strikes can have spillover effects on other groups of workers. If dockworkers secure a strong contract as the result of this strike, it could affect other industries. Alexander Hertel-Fernandez, associate professor of international and public Affairs at Columbia University, and former deputy assistant secretary for research and evaluation at the U.S. Department of Labor, said the success of auto worker strikes and the Hollywood strikes may have emboldened union dockworkers.
“I think you’re likely to see other industries, particularly those most closely aligned with, um, transportation and logistics, really pick up the baton on that, especially if the economic and political environment continues to be favorable to them,” Hertel-Fernandez said.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has called on the Biden administration to invoke the Taft-Hartley Act, which allows presidents to intervene in strikes if it creates a national emergency. President Joe Biden has said that he does not plan to do so.
Biden’s position is unlikely to change,Hertel-Fernandez said, because of the politics of the timing.
“I think you would see a pretty negative response from the labor movement if they were to do so,” he said. “Given that it’s so close to the election, where labor is such an important constituent for the Democrats, that they would be unlikely to do it.”
___
Bonamo reported in Elizabeth for New Jersey Monitor, part of States Newsroom. Quinlan reported from Washington.
Ohio Capital Journal is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Ohio Capital Journal maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor David Dewitt for questions: [email protected]. Follow Ohio Capital Journal on Facebook and X.
